PU.1 meeting 2

Would love some consistency. In an ideal world, I would love for everyone to use git/github as well, but realize that this is probably unrealistic (Maybe future projects?).

Mode 1 (Shreeja, Molly)?

I need to know more about data plan, where does it go? Do we want to be methodical?

|--figures
   |--figure1
      |--code.r
      |--figure.png

Mode 2 (David)

|--figures
|  |--figure1
|     |--figure.png
|--scripts
   |--code.r
   |--code.py
|--data
   |--Glass-lab
   |--GEO
|--makefile

Phenotype RELI

  • Limited by GWAS annotation

DONE GREAT analysis (work on this)

  • Note taken on [2025-05-29 Thu 09:04]
    Moved to PU.1 agenda
  • Subsampling solves the "too many peaks" problem
  • Should try with R as well.

MARIO

  • Still don't have access to EGA datasets